How The Leftists/Warmists Prevent The AGW Scam From Being Exposed

How The Leftists/Warmists Prevent The AGW Scam From Being Exposed



It's easy to manufacture a consensus with that much money and power.



Our means of determining truth has reverted to political authorities and
their pet "scientists" declaring what is true, denying the evidence, and
reviling the unbelievers.









The trick is that they never put any alarmist climate "scientist" in a
position where they have to answer to a knowledgeable critic.



To defend their theory in public, the alarmist climate "scientists"
typically send out people like Tim Flannery or Tony Jones who know next to
nothing about how climate models work.



Then, when confronted with evidence, these believers immediately just say
"but the climate scientists say".



They argue from authority.



It has the same structure as the celebrated argument between Galileo and
the Pope - evidence on one side, and massive political and religious
authority on the other.



Note that the Pope had "scientists" on his side too, in fact the
overwhelming majority, and they were "the consensus".



It's easy to manufacture a consensus with that much money and power.



Alarmist climate "scientists" do make public appearances, but never in a
situation where they come under sustained questioning or criticism from
anyone who understands models.



They have avoided any real debate in public for decades - these alarmists
have never been held accountable, they've never had to answer to people who
knew the problems with their theory. They have never faced an audit, an
inquiry, a Royal Commission, or even a hostile interview - yet they get paid
megabucks and presume to tell the rest of us how to live our lives.



The alarmist government climate "scientists" say they only respond to what
is in the peer-reviewed journals.



But that cover was memorably blown in the ClimateGate scandal of 2009, which
revealed in their own words that they rig the journals to prevent
publication of anything critical. That's why they go on and on about
peer-review - it's their mechanism for keeping out criticism.



The climate "scientists" and their believer acolytes, by the way, are more
than happy to argue with unknowledgeable critics - critics who know
something is wrong, but don't quite have the background or understanding of
the models to know where the weaknesses are in the alarmist case.



The climate "scientists" delight in being more knowledgeable and all
"scientific" against uninformed criticism, because it makes them feel like
real scientists instead of charlatans, and is great PR for their cause.



There is something very religious and mediæval about all of this.



Galileo's case led to the Enlightenment, in which evidence came to triumph
over political authority. In enlightened society, people do not have to
believe something just because some political or religious authority say it
is so - the evidence determines what is considered true.



But on climate, our society is reversing the Enlightenment, slipping back
towards the middle ages. Sure we have smart phones, but our means of
determining truth has reverted to political authorities and their pet
"scientists" declaring what is true, denying the evidence, and reviling the
unbelievers.



It gets worse.



Not only we reversing the values of the Enlightenment, we are
de-industrializing.



These scam artists, led by those technological buffoons the Greens, want us
to close down our cheap and reliable sources of power and go back to using
unreliable and intermittent windmills.



Like in the middle ages, we would be at the mercy of the breeze, using
muscle power where possible. These people pride themselves on being
"progressive", which, like everything else on this topic, is a fully sick
parody of the truth.



This corruption has to end.



We have repeatedly called for a Royal Commission into the science before
taking action, but were of course ignored.



http://joannenova.com.au/2011/09/dr-david-evans-four-fatal-pieces-of-evidence/







Warmest Regards



B0nz0



"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
from natural variation."

Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville





"A major problem has been the co-option of climate science by politics,
ambition, greed, and what seems to be a hereditary human need for a
righteous cause."

"What better cause than "saving" the planet, especially if one can get
ample, secure funding at the same time?"

William Happer, Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics, Princeton
University.





"Today's debate about global warming is essentially a debate about freedom.
The environmentalists would like to mastermind each and every possible (and
impossible) aspect of our lives."

Vaclav Klaus, Blue Planet in Green Shackles





"If climate has not "tipped" in over 4 billion years it's not going to tip
now due to mankind. The planet has a natural thermostat"

Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric Physicist, Professor of Meteorology MIT,
Former IPCC Lead Author



"It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you
have, or how many of you there are, and certainly not how many papers your
side has published, if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is
wrong. Period."

Professor Richard Feynman, Nobel Laureate in Physics



"A core problem is that science has given way to ideology. The scientific
method has been dispensed with, or abused, to serve the myth of man-made
global warming."

"The World Turned Upside Down", Melanie Phillips



"Computer models are built in an almost backwards fashion: The goal is to
show evidence of AGW, and the "scientists" go to work to produce such a
result. When even these models fail to show what advocates want, the data
and interpretations are "fudged" to bring about the desired result"

"The World Turned Upside Down", Melanie Phillips



"Ocean acidification looks suspiciously like a back-up plan by the
environmental pressure groups in case the climate fails to warm: another try
at condemning fossil fuels!"

http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/threat-ocean-acidification-greatly-exaggerated



Before attacking hypothetical problems, let us first solve the real problems
that threaten humanity. One single water pump at an equivalent cost of a
couple of solar panels can indeed spare hundreds of Sahel women the daily
journey to the spring and spare many infections and lives.

Martin De Vlieghere, philosopher



"The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that
it is not utterly absurd; indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of
mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible."

Bertrand Russell