09.02.2010 - 15:48
It is incomprehensible that our 'elite' continues to defend the illusion to act 'legally', only because everything has happened (or rather 'may have happened') legally *on the paper*
*Message and author protected by the 1st amendment (free speech) and similar
constitutional provisions. Violations of this provision through actions by
judiciary and other government criminals will be prosecuted as soon as
conditions permit.*
When the peoples' unruliness about third-world invasion and forceful
mohammedanisation clearly grows as is the case;
when the swiss thanks to their direct democracy unmistakably express their
discontentness with this development;
then it must be clear for every politician and jurist considering himself a
democrate and representative of the state of law: We CANNOT continue as we
have done so far, we MUST obey the demands of our peoples. Our logic, as the
'elite' we knew automatically everything better, in case of doubt were more
right than our peoples, is more than dubious.
So: Who in the parties will read loud this text for the government?
--
Unter blinden ist der einäugige könig. >.)
Repatriate all exotic intruders: jews > Israel, mohammedans >
Mohammedanistan, negros > Africa, indians + gipsies > India, etc !
Then dismantle all surveillance technology !!
Politicians: I want my country back - this is an order by the sovereign !!!
#Prop. 8 sponsors are legally entitled to defend measure, court rules
17.11.2011 - 19:51 - Posts: 1
(33NL33) LEGALLY DIFFERENTIATE SINCE 2004 CURRENTLY THAT EXAMPLE PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS LEGALLY AVAILABLE ON WORLD WIDE WEB SINCE AT LEAST 2004 CURRENTLY OF PERSONS OF PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS BY OTHER THAN KMD AND/OR CRIMINAL INTENT PROBLEMS (owx)
28.01.2010 - 22:00 - Posts: 1
Ladies and gentlemen, this controversy should never have happened. This ruling of the court should never have happened. The rulings of the Supreme Court should never have happened. I talked with Supreme Court Associate Justice Thomas several year
26.11.2011 - 17:23 - Posts: 1
(nc)FOR EXAMPLE, CHRISTIAN COALTION ATTORNEY MAY LEGALLY USE CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS ON BEHALF OF USA SO THAT "NON-RELIGIOUS" KMD IS RAPED BY OTHER THAN KMD, BUT ONLY LEGALLY DONE IF CHRISTIAN COALITION ATIORNEY PERSONALLY GAINS ONLY NEVER RELIGION
09.09.2010 - 04:58 - Posts: 1
KMD 100% CONFIDENT THAT USA IS LEGALLY OBLIGATED (#####) WITHOUT CONTROL OF KMD (##) TO "SELF-DEFEND" USA WITH CONVICTION OF OTHER THAN KMD AND/OR AGAINST UNCONVICTED LEGAL OBLIGATION OF "LEGALITIES OF PROBABLE CAUSE" OF ALL FAMILIES & FRIENDS "CHALLENGE"
29.11.2010 - 20:42 - Posts: 1
KMD 100% CONFIDENT THAT USA IS LEGALLY OBLIGATED (#####) WITHOUT CONTROL OF KMD (##) TO "SELF-DEFEND" USA WITH CONVICTION OF OTHER THAN KMD AND/OR AGAINST UNCONVICTED LEGAL OBLIGATION OF "LEGALITIES OF PROBABLE CAUSE" OF ALL FAMILIES & FRIENDS "CHALLENGE"
29.11.2010 - 20:42 - Posts: 1
KMD 100% CONFIDENT THAT USA IS LEGALLY OBLIGATED (#####) WITHOUT CONTROL OF KMD (##) TO "SELF-DEFEND" USA WITH CONVICTION OF OTHER THAN KMD AND/OR AGAINST UNCONVICTED LEGAL OBLIGATION OF "LEGALITIES OF PROBABLE CAUSE" OF ALL FAMILIES & FRIENDS "CHALLENGE"
29.11.2010 - 20:42 - Posts: 1
